31 July 2020

Two guys, one lighthouse

I don't remember where exactly I heard about "The Lighthouse". Given the amount of various horror and movie news I follow, it could be anywhere. However, I know what exactly encouraged me to check this film out. It was... A "Boku no Hero Academia" AU – Shipwreck AU by Zhampy (which I really recommend, it's great!). I loved it so much I just had to see the movie that inspired it. Fortunately, one of libraries in my city has "The Lighthouse" in its collection. I was so excited, I watched this film the same day I got it and... Well... I'll be honest: to say it was wild is to say fucking nothing.
I know jokes about Pattinson's most famous role had been done to death, but: Edward looks strange with moustache.
"The Lighthouse" tells a story of two lighthouse keepers, old and experienced Thomas Wake (Willem Dafoe) and rookie Ephraim Winslow (Robert Pattinson). After arriving at the island in the middle of nowhere, they are supposed to spend four weeks there and take care of the lighthouse (what a surprise!). However, from the beginning nothing goes as it should: Wake treats Winslow like shit, makes him do all the hard work and doesn't allow him to see the Fresnel lens. Fortunately, as time passes, the guys start to get on a little better.

And then things happen. Many things. And due to the fact "The Lighthouse" is more "how it happened" than "what happened", this post will be spoilerific as hell, so

SPOILER ALERT!!!

We are presented with two main characters in the beginning, but with story's progress the movie centres more on Winslow and his fall into insanity. He starts as a pretty sensible (if quiet) man and then becomes more and more unhinged. The movie doesn't explain if he used to be sane or was mad from the beginning and just suppressed it. It also doesn't give a clear reason of his madness – it can be either Wake's abuse or something supernatural. According to some theories, the whole plot can also be a Winslow's dying dream. However, this all isn't actually important. Only thing that matters is the process and, actually, it works surprisingly well. Pattinson's portrayal of a man, who is gradually losing his mind is very convincing and shows his brilliant acting skills. He slowly builds up the tension to the point, when the ending and him finally losing his shit feels almost cathartic.

And it's amazing.
While I can't say a bad word about Dafoe's acting (it was brilliant), Wake isn't even half interesting as Winslow. To be honest, for most of the time this drunken asshole was just pissing me off. Of course, he has some great moments as a character, like the scene with a curse or his "relationship" with the lighthouse, but still... Sometimes I felt the creators just overdid it. For example, I know this farting thing was (probably) meant to be a joke to relieve the tension, but I got tired of it halfway into the movie. Maybe it's because I hate toilet humour (I'll be honest: most of shitty jokes aren't funny when you suffer from chronic intestinal illness), I don't know. Or maybe it really is just too much.

To be honest, even without farting Thomas Wake would be a hard to bear character. He is obnoxious, bossy, arrogant and drinks way too much alcohol. Actually, if I were to point in the film one thing that really disturbed me, it would be drinking. Okay, I have to admit scenes with Wake and Winslow singing and dancing are pretty funny and I even chuckled at "All right, have it your way. I like your cooking", but the rest... Damn, that really is scary. The most important factor of that scariness is the realistic portrayal of alcoholism. Wake drinks all the time, to the point that near the ending lack of alcohol is one of his biggest worries. Also, the scene when he urges Winslow to drink with him is so relatable it made me extremely uncomfortable (due to various reasons I'm an abstinent and I can't count how many times I got shamed or laughed at because of it).

While we are at it, personally I think shit hits the fan not because Winslow kills the seagull, but because he starts abusing alcohol. Being drunk basically makes him lose all the control he had earlier and unleash all suppressed emotions. Of course, he has already started losing his mind, but the intoxication makes it quicker and more violent. It's also worth noticing both he and Wake are completely smashed in the ending, which only fuels their obsessions and paranoias. It's truly horrifying.

So drink responsibly, sweethearts!
Of course, I'm not saying that the rest of the film isn't scary at all... However, I'd rather call it creepy. While it has some more typical scares, like the scene with severed head in the basket, it mostly relies on unsettling atmosphere and damn, it's done awesomely. The audiovisual side is perfect. Sparse music (most sounds are the in-universe ones) and deep shadows create amazing uneasy feelings. Also, recording the movie on an old tape in black and white was great idea. Because of that, most scenes are incredibly dark with very few bright points. The fact we can't see everything only adds to the general creepiness.

Actually, I really enjoyed the supernatural aspect of the story, or rather the ambiguity of it. To the end we have no idea who Wake actually is (is he even human?!), what's going on with the siren (I think Winslow is hallucinating her, but it's only my interpretation) and what actually was on the top of the lighthouse. The general mindfuck is aided by the montage, which tends to be very trippy. However, my favourite thing is the addiction of sexual themes. It isn't very explicit, but blends with the rest pretty well, fleshing out the general squickiness. To be honest, I wish more horror creators added erotica to their works, fear and sex go together awesomely (which is why Luca Guadagnino's "Suspiria" is my absolutely favourite movie ever. The mix of horror and sensuality here is done perfectly).

But let's omit the standard "How to have sex with a mermaid?" discussion, it isn't that important, at least not now.
Time for a little digression, because there is one thing this movie made me think of. When Wake insults Winslow, he often calls him a dog. Later, when the tables turn, Winslow makes Wake behave like one. During this scene I was asking myself "Why is comparing anyone to a dog something offensive?". Damn, even now calling someone a "dog" is insulting. Quick research showed me people often consider dogs as inferior to them, so comparing someone to one suggests we view this person as worse. To be honest, I think it's a relic of the past that should be dropped as soon as possible. Dogs are loyal, friendly and love their humans unconditionally. They are absurdly cute too. Also, media depict them as human's best friends. Taking this all into consideration, the fact that in 21st century "dog" still is an insult is a prime example of hypocrisy. Times change and language should too.

Coming back to the topic: actually, I really enjoyed watching "The Lighthouse". I expected an artistic, slow burn horror and got it. Of course, it took me a while to get used to the visuals (I usually don't watch black and white movies), but they didn't bother me as much as I thought they would. However, I'm not sure if I can recommend this movie. It's brutal, crazy, full of mindfuck and sometimes obscene. And awesome.
So awesome.

PS I made a Twitter account earlier this month. I'm pretty active there (or at least more active than on this blog), so if you want to be up to date with my shit, see WIPs or read some of my contextless thoughts, follow @kikihakanate. Thank you in advance, sweethearts!


Image sources:
All movie stills were screenshot by me from the official trailer and belong to A24.
Trailer: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hyag7lR8CPA

18 July 2020

Pika, pika, pika!

Despite my great love for Pokemon I missed "Detective Pikachu" when it was in the cinemas. I mean, I knew about the movie, I even wanted to see it, but I had no time. Then I kinda forgot about it. Some time ago my mum reminded me that this movie exists, more, she wanted me to watch it with her (which was pretty surprising, because she's never been interested in Pokemon, but okay). So I did. And I have no idea what I should think about it.
BTW Mum wanted to watch it, because she saw a teaser and thought Pikachu was cute. Well, that wasn't a bad reason.
The movie is based on "Detective Pikachu" game. Unfortunately, I haven't played it, so I can't compare them. However, Internet claims plots are quite similar, at least at the beginning: we have a young man, Tim Goodman (Justice Smith), who comes to Ryme City – a metropolis, where people and Pokemon live next to each other – to investigate a disappearance of his father, detective Harry Goodman. There he meets his parent's working partner, Detective Pikachu (voiced by Ryan Reynolds in original dub), with whom he can communicate. Together they try to solve Harry Goodman's latest case. They are aided by several locals, mainly an energetic reporter Lucy Stevens (Kathryn Newton) and her Psyduck.

I can't say I didn't enjoy the film, because I did. To be honest, it's impossible not to be enjoyed, especially by Pokemon fans. Every scene is basically flooded by various Pokemon. The SFX staff did amazing job here: the creatures are so detailed and natural looking, they basically feel real. Watching them move and interact with their surroundings is a pure pleasure. I especially like the scene with Bulbasaur – they were so adorable.

Little green cuties.
Also, it was nice to actually see Pokemon covered with fur. I know it may sound strange, but due to games' graphic limitations (and probably art style too) many of creatures looked like rubber toys. Making them soft and fluffy was really refreshing idea.

Gotta hug them all!
Generally, when it comes to the visual side, "Detective Pikachu" is a true feast. Awesome scenography, bright lights and saturated colours make this movie so lively it has to be seen. Action scenes are also great, dynamic but clear. I wish I could say the same about the audio, but well... Okay, it wasn't bad. The score isn't special (except for the moments, when it uses original anime theme songs), but isn't horrible, just generic. Sound effects are also nice. The problem is I had to watch this movie with Polish dub – it was aired live on TV and, while I could change the audio to the original one, I couldn't switch on subtitles. I would leave it like that, but my mum doesn't understand English, so we had to stay with Polish dub. And damn, it was awful. Voices sounded artificial and out of place, but okay, Polish dubs of newer live action films tend to suffer from that. The worst thing was the characters spoke pretty unintelligible. And when you have to strain to understand dialogues, then you know the dubbing department did a shitty job.

As I mentioned earlier, it's impossible to not enjoy this movie as a Pokemon fan. Amount of lore details crammed into it is unimaginable. It's especially nice given the fact, usually filmmakers don't care much about source material. Here every scene is rich in love towards Pokemon and I couldn't help but smile while watching it. However, there was one thing that effectively disturbed me.

The plot.

SPOILER ALERT!!!

For most of the time, the plot just... Exists. It's generic, full of cliches, but not bad. However, near the end the scriptwriters started doing plot twists and holy shit, they. Are. Egregious. Okay, making Howard Clifford the main villain, who framed his son wasn't a bad move. More, I really liked the twist with Ditto. Same for the reveal of Harry Goodman's role in all this shit – it was good, if very predictive. However, then we got to know Howard's villainous plan and no matter how hard I try, I just can't take it seriously. I mean... The idea of kidnapping one of the most powerful Pokemon for experiments is old, but reasonable. Same for making a berserker serum. Transferring consciousness to said Pokemon body was actually quite clever. But merging everyone with their Pokemon? Seriously, movie? That doesn't make fucking sense! What does he achieve by doing so? Does he actually achieves anything? Because I doubt he would put so much time and money in his plan just for satisfaction. It is hinted that Howard Clifford has a massive god complex, but still... Even if it was his sole motivation, the amount of preparation is horrendous compared to the effects.

The very last twist in the movie was even worse. After witnessing all the absurd of the ending I just waited for the reveal, that Detective Pikachu is really Tim's father. And fuck, they did it. They really did it. They pulled "Luke, I'm your father" at the end. Okay, maybe it wasn't exactly that, instead of being Tim's father Detective Pikachu's consciousness was just merged with Harry Goodman's one... But the aim of the twist is the same. Also, I totally don't get the idea of Mewtwo keeping Harry's body to revive him later. I mean, it makes (kind of) sense in universe – Mewtwo wanted to save him – but personally I think the story would benefit if the revival didn't happen. Tim and Pikachu having to learn how to live with the revelation would be much better end than standard "your father's safe and sound, he doesn't remember anything, but who cares, he's alive, happy end". Instead all character development and evolving (pun not intended) relationship between Tim and Detective Pikachu went in vain.

End of spoilers.

In general, "Detective Pikachu" is not a masterpiece of cinematography. It's just an extremely cliched movie based on a video game. However, if you can turn a blind eye for some absurds of the plot, it becomes a beautifully made, entertaining film. And no, the viewer isn't required to know much about Pokemon. My mum had no idea about the lore and still enjoyed it pretty much.
To be honest, I'd be surprised if she didn't. There are so many cute Pokemon in it!







Image sources:
All movie stills were screenshot by me from official trailers and belong to Warner Bros. Pictures.
Trailer 1: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1roy4o4tqQM
Trailer 2: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bILE5BEyhdo